Site Loader
Rock Street, San Francisco

Chemical companies in England are confronting increasing force per unit area to better their environmental, wellness and safety record, in peculiar, entering pollution degrees and bettering energy and resource usage. Regulatory demands are booming, with IPPC ( 2008 ) , EU Emissions Trading Scheme and REACH ( 2007 ) holding important impact on the transparence of chemical use in fabrication merchandises. The stronger regulative Torahs derived for risky chemicals encourage inventions within the chemical industry. These inventions potentially can profit national economic systems and aid with other issues such as wellness and the environment.

The bulk of chemicals manufactured in England are exported to the planetary market, so a competitory lineation is required for manufacturers to run successfully. The operations of the chemical industry can be potentially risky and its merchandises are used daily by 1000000s so these lineations must besides be thorough to guarantee safety. Despite the dangers associated with chemical industry, when the right ordinances are used by companies there is a low hazard for employees, vicinities and their clients.

Table of Contentss


There are 14,000 chemical houses that jointly produce 21,500 chemical merchandises in over 90 states. Of these companies, 2,780 are of European beginning, which jointly have 3,840 works sites runing within the EU. “ Producing chemicals means bring forthing, in a chemical works by chemical processing for commercial intents. ” ( Environment Agency: Environmental permitting for the chemical industry. ) Most of the companies are regulated by the pieces of statute law below, and many require a trim Environmental Permit from the Environment Agency.

EU Regulations

IPPC 1996


Restriction of Hazardous Substances Directive 2003

This statute law restricts the usage of environmentally harmful substances such as Lead, Mercury and Cadmium among others in electrical and electronic devices. It is closely linked to the Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Directive or WEEE ( see subdivision below ) . This statute law to a great extent affects the recycling of polymers with man-made compounds known as Brominated Flame Retardants in their composing. This is due to the demand to the proctor the content of the BFR ‘s in the stuffs you ‘re recycling. This directing merely applies to consumer contraptions and non to merchandises to be used in industrial workss and tools.

WEEE Directive 2007

The WEEE or Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment directive is intended to cut down the sum of waste electronic and electrical equipment that goes to landfill. The purpose is to be achieved by doing alterations throughout the rhythm of EEE. For illustration ; redesigning merchandises so that they last thirster, are made out of more readily recycled merchandises and more easy dismantled and re-cycled.

The WEEE directive chiefly affects manufacturers and makers of electrical and electronic equipment. The WEEE directive does nevertheless affect consumers in that the cost of roll uping WEEE from WEEE aggregation points and treating systems will be met by the manufacturers, so finally the monetary values of EEE will lift. Conformity with WEEE ordinances involves manufacturers fall ining a ‘producer conformity strategy ‘ which provides links between the makers and the environment bureau. This strategy enables WEEE to be efficaciously and economically recycled and reused. Besides new EEE must be marked with certain information to rectify disposal by the terminal user and information must be available to intervention installations so new WEEE can be expeditiously processed.

Ozone Consuming Substances Regulations 2009

The Ozone-depleting Substances ordinance came into force in March 2009 and specifies regulations on the production, import, export, selling, usage, recovery, recycling, renewal and devastation of substances that deplete the ozone bed.

These ordinances affect chemical fabrication companies which can be known to retrieve, recycle, reclaim and destroy controlled substances. The ordinances make it an offense for a person/company to transport out relevant work affecting controlled substances unless that person/company is certified as competent to make so.

Environmental Damage Regulations 2009

“ The Environmental Damage Regulations are intended to forestall and rectify harm to land, H2O and biodiversity. They reinforce the ‘polluter wages ‘ rule by doing concerns financially apt for menaces of harm or existent harm. ” ( Natural England: Environmental Damage Regulations ) . The ordinance focusses on sites across the EU, including National Parks, Protected Marine Areas, Special Protected Areas and Biosphere Reserves. A company could be prosecuted if they were found to hold done harm to any of these Special Areas of Conservation ( SACs ) .

Environmental Permitting Regulations 2010

The Environmental Permitting Regulation was put into force in April 2010 to replace the out-of-date 2007 ordinances. The EPR is counsel on the mandates you need for installings, waste, H2O discharge or groundwater activities.

If a company produces chemicals it will necessitate an environmental license to run legitimately. Depending on the type of installation applying, the license may be issued straight from the Environment Agency or the local authorization.


REACH is the European Community Regulation on chemicals and their safe usage. It deals with the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemical substances. The object of the REACH act is to spread out the protection of both human wellness and the saving of the environment through better and earlier designation of potentially risky chemical substances. At the same clip, REACH attempts to better on the innovationA and competition of EU chemical industries. The REACH ordinance is continually being amended, adding more substances and chemicals to let for a broader scope of companies to profit.

“ The REACH Regulation places greater duty on industry to pull off the hazards from chemicals and to supply safety information on the substances. The Regulation besides calls for the progressive permutation of the most unsafe chemicals when suited options have been identified. ” ( European Commission: Environment: Range ) .

European Chemicals Agency ( ECHA )

All companies that handle the covered chemicals/substances are required to garner information on the belongingss of them, which enables safe handling. This collected information is so to be registered in a cardinal database run by the European Chemicals Agency ( ECHA ) . ECHA Acts of the Apostless as the hub of the REACH ordinance, and arranges the thorough rating of leery chemicals to be added to the database. This database is accessible by the public sphere, intending that consumers and professionals can happen relevant jeopardy information.

ISO14001 2004

This is an international criterion set up by the International Standards Organisation and contains a set of demands that can be objectively audited. The ISO14001 criterion is set out to cover any company regardless of size or installations and is voluntary. As a voluntary criterion, “ it does non province demands for environmental public presentation, but maps out a model that a company or organisation can follow to put up an effectual environmental direction system. ” ( International Standards Administration: ISO14000 – Environmental direction ) It is intended to back up companies who are persistently looking towards take downing their environmental impact through bettering efficiency with resources and take downing waste degrees. Although the criterion is voluntary it is the UK ‘s most normally used criterion harmonizing to DEFRA ( The Department for Environment, Food & A ; Rural Affairs ) .


“ The EU Eco-Management and Audit Scheme ( EMAS ) is a direction tool for companies and other administrations to measure study and better their environmental public presentation. ” ( European Commission: Environment ; EMAS ) . The Scheme is voluntary and was launched in 1995 for companies in the industrial sector, and has ( in 2001 ) been opened to all sectors public and private.

UK Legislation

“ Since the UK joined the European Community in 1972 European environmental statute law has progressively shaped environmental Torahs. A series of individual issue Directives were made but have progressively been replaced by “ model ” and “ girl ” directives ( e.g. the Waste Framework Directive and the daughter End of Life Vehicles Directive ) ” ( UKELA: Making the jurisprudence work for a better environment: Environmental Law ) . This means that a few of the UK and resultantly, England ‘s environmental Torahs are based upon international conventions and understandings.

Environment Protection Act ( 1980 )

This is an act which introduces a system of incorporate pollution control for the disposal of waste and trade wastewater to set down, H2O or air. The parts of the Act are focused chiefly on agribusiness, but some subdivisions can be applied to the industrial sector. “ It establishes incorporate pollution control and gives local governments new powers to command air pollution from a scope of prescribed procedures ” ( The Environmental Protection Act ) . It improves the regulations on waste disposal and screens statutory nuisances and clean air.

Water Resources Act

The Water Resources Act 1991 is an act of parliament that is aimed at modulating the H2O resources, H2O quality and degrees of H2O pollution within the UK. The act besides ( through amendments ) stretches to cover the construction of direction of H2O resources, the criterions expected for controlled Waterss and possibly most significantly what is considered to be H2O pollution.

The act empowers the Environment Agency to convey condemnable charges against companies or single people who are responsible for misdemeanors refering the H2O affairs covered above. Any company that discharges sewerage or trade wastewater into surface H2O ( rivers, lakes, watercourses, groundwater or the sea ) require a license or discharge consent. If the guidelines and conditions given in the license are non met either through an act of carelessness or purpose so an offense is committed. The punishments for perpetrating an offense of this nature carry a maximal charge of 2 old ages imprisonment and an limitless mulct.

Clean Air Act 1993

The Clean Air Act 1993 was put in topographic point to protect the environment against the addition of unsafe gases into the ambiance. Possibly the most applicable portion to a chemical fabrication company is Part VII Section 66 as this establishes Torahs against the discharge of noxious and violative gas in alkalis plants. This means that the proprietor of any alkali involved industry shall utilize the most executable agencies for forestalling the flight of noxious or harmful gases through the industry of chemicals, into the ambiance.

Radioactive Substances Act 1993

This act restricts the aggregation, distribution and disposal of radioactive substances. The statute law sates that a license must be held by a company every bit good as the employees. It is besides stated that it is non permitted to obtain and hive away radioactive substances on a personal abode. It besides states that you must keep a licence to roll up or utilize radioactive substances unless they are in a nomadic device, such as a ticker with luminescent custodies.

Land Drainage Act 1991

The intent of this act is to protect and territories known as internal drainage territories which are countries within the countries of the inundation defense mechanism commissions by puting drainage operations. Internal drainage boards are the drainage board for an internal drainage territory. As the Land Drainage Act protects land in order to advance countries of low taint, a company would hold to hold consent if they wanted to dispose of any stuffs as making so without permission would be interrupting the jurisprudence. Permission would hold to be sought from the authorization if a chemical fabrication company thought they might necessitate to utilize drainage boards. It is of import that a company ensures that the land that their merchandise is being deposited on is non protected by the jurisprudence, and that it is specifically for that intent.

Waste Management Act 1996

Waste minimization is the most environmentally desirable waste direction solution and is the highest component of the waste hierarchy. The 1998 Waste Minimisation Act gave local governments in England, Scotland and Wales statutory power to originate attempts to understate waste coevals. However, the Strategy contains no quantitative marks for overall waste decrease. As the OECD late commented “ steps to promote waste minimization remain really weak ” . ( OECD, Environmental Performance Reviews: United Kingdom, 2002, P. 86. ) The resources available under the National Waste Minimisation and Recycling Fund have been mostly directed at recycling undertakings instead than blow minimization attempts.

Case Study

Company One – BASF

BASF is a transnational chemical bring forthing company that was originally founded in April 1865 in Baden as a gasworks to supply street illuming for the town. The company began to utilize the waste merchandise ( pitch ) from the gas production to bring forth man-made dyes. These dyes became the company ‘s chief beginning of concern with around 80 % of their production devoted to dyes in 1901.

In 1880 BASF set up two gross revenues offices in England, one in London and one in Manchester and within three old ages British gross revenues accounted for 26.8 % of the entire one-year gross revenues of the whole company. Along with international enlargement, the company ‘s merchandise catalogue began to turn exponentially. “ [ Today ] BASF is the universe ‘s prima chemical company: Its portfolio ranges from chemicals, plastics, public presentation merchandises and harvest protection merchandises to oil and gas ” ( BASF with positive consequences in ends for environment, wellness and safety )

In add-on to roll uping with All UK and EU statute law, BASF is the lone Company registered on the German Stock Exchange ( DAX ) that publishes an incorporate one-year study including a subdivision affecting their environmental certificates. BASF aims for a year-on-year decrease of pollutants released form their mills both into the ambiance, and in the signifier of land pollution.

Company Two – Merck Millipore

The UK based chemical makers Merck Millipore has set up several safety cyberspaces so that they can guarantee that they do non travel against any of their several statute laws. The company it ‘s self-had developed several new merchandises to greatly better the safety within its research labs. They have besides gone to great extent to guarantee the maximal sum of safety when transporting its merchandises to avoid spills and possible taint of the environment.

The company considers the environment in most countries of the production and distribution of its merchandises. They aim to better the efficiency of their production procedure to cut down the sum of waste they produce. This thought besides spreads to the distribution /selling of their merchandise because they offer each of their merchandises in a scope of sums so that the purchaser can cut down the sum of residue or left over merchandise they have staying because this decreases their costs due to the reduced sum they must pass on disposal of chemical waste.

Equally good as guarantee that they make their ain procedure corsets within the jurisprudence and eco-friendly they besides produce several merchandises that help other companies cut down their consequence on their environment. Several of their merchandises can assist proctor degrees of toxic substances in H2O beginnings every bit good as in the air around them.


Tougher regulations pull offing the chemical Industry and their merchandises at the planetary, national and regional degrees have encouraged the whole industry to seek to hold a smaller impact on the environment. As a consequence of this, there has been uninterrupted innovation of safer, more ecological chemicals to be used as options to older and more harmful 1s. This means, new markets have been created, taking to new investing and potency for new occupations. The industry, despite holding to digest extra costs of environmental statute law, remains committed to invention and changeless betterment. Despite the chemical industry in England ( and in Europe ) compliing to alterations in EU and UK statute law, the hereafter of the English industry relies to a great extent on the demands of the consumer, and hence the load is on them to make everything in their power to hold desirable certificates. This is a important facet in demoing how ordinance drives invention and changes the form of industry to profit both the economic system and the right to a healthy environment.


Environment Agency: Environmental permitting for the chemical industry. Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: // [ Accessed 12 March 2013 ]

International Standards Administration: ISO14000 – Environmental direction. Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: // [ Accessed 15 March 2013 ]

The Environmental Protection Act, Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: // id=18388 [ Accessed 13 March 2013 ]

Natural England: Environmental Damage Regulations. Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: // [ Accessed 16 March 2013 ]

European Commission: Environment: Reach, Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: // [ Accessed 14 March 2013 ]

European Commission: Environment ; EMAS. Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: // [ Accessed 15 March 2013 ]

UKELA: Making the jurisprudence work for a better environment: Environmental Law. Available from: hypertext transfer protocol: // id=14 [ Accessed 12 March 2013 ]

BASF with positive consequences in ends for environment, wellness and safety. Available From: hypertext transfer protocol: // [ Accessed 18 March 2013 ]

OECD, Environmental Performance Reviews: United Kingdom, 2002, p.86.A hypertext transfer protocol: //

A. D. Chandler Jr. , 2009. Determining the Industrial Century: The Remarkable Story of the Evolution of the Modern Chemical and Pharmaceutical Industries ( Harvard Studies in Business History ) . Edition. Harvard University Press.

Post Author: admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *